The problem is that evidence of collaboration doesn’t substantiate anything at all about participation in prism or any other illegal or underhanded scheme.
We know that Google does have portals to service lawful government information requests.
It’s also entirely possible that Google participated in some kind of analytics development based on their web indexing and nothing to do with private user data.
Either of these would be at least plausible explanations for these comments as “they joined prism and handed over all data to the NSA”.
The problem is that evidence of collaboration doesn’t substantiate anything at all about participation in prism or any other illegal or underhanded scheme.
We know that Google does have portals to service lawful government information requests.
It’s also entirely possible that Google participated in some kind of analytics development based on their web indexing and nothing to do with private user data.
Either of these would be at least plausible explanations for these comments as “they joined prism and handed over all data to the NSA”.
Innuendo is not evidence.