From the article: "Undeniably, further studies are needed to clarify the optimal supplementation of vitamin D, although it is uncertain whether a universal recommended dietary allowance is feasible."
So perhaps they've established the RDA is too low, but the article itself says they haven't nailed down what the new recommendation should be. That's probably more than a 3 year process (now massively disrupted) assuming that consensus is building in the direction.
So perhaps they've established the RDA is too low, but the article itself says they haven't nailed down what the new recommendation should be. That's probably more than a 3 year process (now massively disrupted) assuming that consensus is building in the direction.