> A single failure point is not what worries me. They are competent enough to avoid that.
I remember when they offered text obfuscation protection service (i.e. hiding emails unless you click on them). It was literally ceasar cypher encoded text with the N argument right there next to it.
I'm sure they are much beyond that now but I find your blind trust and assumption rather hilarious.
My trust isn't blind, it's based on their solid track record in availability and network ops, while your example is about something different (text obfuscation).
Anyway, I wasn't aware about that case, do you have a link to learn more?
I remember when they offered text obfuscation protection service (i.e. hiding emails unless you click on them). It was literally ceasar cypher encoded text with the N argument right there next to it.
I'm sure they are much beyond that now but I find your blind trust and assumption rather hilarious.