Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why?



Because they really showed their ugly side when it came to commercialization and the patent court case.


It wasn't just that, it was the entire hype machine. Lots of schadenfreude going around today. I probably would have preferred they split the CRISPR award across chemistry and medicine prizes, but life isn't fair.


Sorry, I'm out of the loop on this. Can you explain it a bit more? I was aware of the lawsuit between Berkeley and MIT over the patent, but not of the specifics.



Not that Michael is biased at all, either...

Anyway, I'm happy Jennifer and Emmanuelle won over others and thinks this was the right call. The discovery of the idea was the most important part here, bs showing it in human cells (which wasn't that hard afterwards).


Two wrongs making a right. I see.


why is premature? or why those two than the others?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: