Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Would the situation be better when you'd have to explain why does his monitor have 3 different connection ports but not the 5th one he needs? Or that he's lacking the right converter cables for all different 5 possible types?


"If it fits, it works" is pretty easy to explain. An adapter cable is also easy to explain: it fits, so it will work. With USB C, there are scenarios where you can have an adapter cable and it'll still not work.


>"If it fits, it works" is pretty easy to explain.

It also isn't correct. It wasn't true as far as VGA and DVI adapters were concerned. Nor is it true for connecting two HDMI-In ports, for example.


If I recall correctly, DVI had three main variants: -I, -A, and -D. A DVI-to-VGA adapter would have a DVI-A plug. The video card would have either DVI-I or DVI-D. If the card had DVI-D, it only offered digital and the DVI-A plug would not physically fit. If the card had DVI-I, it would offer both analog and digital and both DVI-A and DVI-D would fit. So, if it fits it works!

And yeah, the HDMI thing is of course true, I'll give you that. :-)


The pin helped sometimes but there were a few arrangements that fit but did not work. Female DVI to Female VGA adapters existed for going from VGA to DVI-A but this meant you could fit a pinless DVI-D cable and a VGA cable together this way.


Easy to explain but extremely inconvenient for users because it doesn't gracefully degrade like USB-C can in a large amount of cases.


Yes, that would be easier to understand. That is as easy to understand as a child's "shape sorter" toy:

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71F1sWVVXAL...

If the monitor has a Triangle port, and the computer has a Square port, you need a Triangle-to-Square adapter. Simple.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: