Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

New York Times [1] -- March 24, 1990:

"A Federal judge today dismissed almost all the closely watched copyright lawsuit filed by the Xerox Corporation against Apple Computer Inc. [...] Even if Xerox prevails on the one count it can still pursue, it cannot win much because the judge threw out all the counts seeking damages, attorneys involved in the case said. [...]

Xerox had sought to have Apple's Macintosh screen copyrights declared invalid, contending that they were fraudulently obtained because Apple had failed to tell the Copyright Office about Xerox's prior work. Xerox also accused Apple of unfair competition, saying that Apple's claim to Macintosh screen technology had made it difficult for Xerox to license its technology to other companies."

I think the Wikipedia article on Apple v. Microsoft says it best:

"Xerox's lawsuit appeared to be a defensive move to ensure that if Apple v. Microsoft established that "look and feel" was copyrightable, then Xerox would be the primary beneficiary, rather than Apple."

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/1990/03/24/business/most-of-xerox-s-s...

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v._Microso...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: