I'm not a lawyer but I don't really see how this has anything to do with trademarks.
The article mentions trademarks only insofar as some icons on the Galaxy may infringe on trademarks held by Apple (i.e., the icon is so close to the iOS version that a consumer would not be able to tell the difference).
Everything else is a patent dispute, and I think all of us know the validity of these patent-based suits.
It really doesn't have anything to do with trademarks at all, except for a couple of instances of icons distributed with the phone.
The article mentions trademarks only insofar as some icons on the Galaxy may infringe on trademarks held by Apple (i.e., the icon is so close to the iOS version that a consumer would not be able to tell the difference).
Everything else is a patent dispute, and I think all of us know the validity of these patent-based suits.
It really doesn't have anything to do with trademarks at all, except for a couple of instances of icons distributed with the phone.