Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't believe monopolies are illegal.

It's using an advantage in one area to force concessions in an unrelated area that I believe is illegal.

For example, Microsoft had an effective monopoly over PC operating systems.

That was unfortunate, but not illegal.

It was when they used that monopoly to disadvantage a rival browser maker --- Netscape -- that they broke anti-trust law.

I'm most interested in seeing what happens over Apple's decisions to force app providers to use Apple Sign-in if the offer any other 3rd party SSO.

As a developer, I may have valid security concerns regarding Apple Sign-in.

So their app store dominance seems unrelated to SSO infrastructure. And I don't fully understand how they can force me to use it if I decide to support Google or Facebook SSO in my app.

So I do wonder if that is an anti-trust violation.



> It's using an advantage in one area to force concessions in an unrelated area that I believe is illegal.

Can you find me a single example of a monopoly (excluding regulated utilities) that don't use their power to force concessions in an unrelated area? What's the point otherwise?


We are at a state where these tech companies have the same value as countries and entire stock indexes. It is obscene, and yet they make their devices more locked down, harder/ILLEGAL! to fix by paying off politicians both to not enforce laws and to write them in their favor at the expense of smaller competition.

The merger of state and corporate powers is complete. We live in a fascist world with surveillance that Stalin could only dream of.

So yea, a bit "unfortunate"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: