After reading the opening paragraph I instantly thought of Greta Thunberg (in a good way!), especially this part:
> or as dangerous future citizens who might use their unique talents to subvert authority.
...where the authority being subverted is that of a certain country's dominant social class that really doesn't like being told they're in the wrong...
----
More cynically though: almost all of the certified G&T folks I knew in school - and equivalents at university - gave up on their idealism and got degrees to become a city quant.
Except for one... he got into UW at 16 and had a head for epidemiology but was also interested in global geopolitics so he tried to major in both subjects at undergrad (uh-oh...) - but being so young at university in a course where social-networking is important meant he simply couldn't attend important events because he was below the drinking age. Anywya long story short he's now a water treatment plant operator and he tells me he's never been happier.
I'm unsure how to find the studies but when G&T children are not put in accelerated programs they typically suffer from mental issues and isolation and end up underperforming their peers. Your acquaintance could have been someone great, I guess.
Reminder that Hawking couldn't be arsed to spend his time with physics and went rowing instead (it was only when he got his deadline that he started to work on physics nonstop)
I met a former nuclear physicist in Oakland, who had moved to working in water treatment who told me 'flocculation, way more complex, far more interesting than nuclear chemistry' he seemed happy too.
Support at home is even more important. Students of all ages really just need as much information as you can feed them. Ever met a four year old? They are all questions and sponge up information. There’s no reason they have to stop at some point, just keep feeding them more info and encouraging them.
> being so young at university in a course where social-networking is important meant he simply couldn't attend important events because he was below the drinking age.
What? This has never stopped any other college student.
He said there were university-operated things like postgrad careers fairs, mini-conferences and academic social-networking events that were held in venues where the entire conference area being used was legally a 21+ area (open bar, I guess) which normally wouldn't be a problem because they were events for people who wouldn't normally be younger than 22. I'm not saying that problem alone was the cause of him dropping out, but he told it to me as an example of the hurdles someone faces as a minor university student.
I believe Greta Thunberg is someone put in place to EXERT authority.
If you go to the meetings of the financial elite of the world, they have in their agenda exactly what GT wants: Taxing C02, forcing people to eat insects, because meat and fish is unsustainable...
Greta is used to exert authority from those people in charge into the mass of the population. It is the reason media loves GT, because media is controlled by the big guys.
A dangerous person would be some environmentalist that actually knows what he is talking about, and who is popular.
Idealism is not a virtue per se(just dreaming about a better world without doing anything). I know quite a lot idealist that actually do all what they can to improve the world. They become realist because it is hard. It is one thing to say people should not abandon dogs and another thing creating a refuge for animals and expending all your money feeding and taking care of abandoned dogs, taking no vacations(because animals eat every day...)and so on.
Realism is what happens when idealists take responsibility, and do something. Reality has limits, it is always finite what you can do, dreams could be perfect.
Greta is just a kid that is angry(because she is ill) and is being manipulated from those in charge.
> If you go to the meetings of the financial elite of the world, they have in their agenda exactly what GT wants: Taxing C02, forcing people to eat insects, because meat and fish is unsustainable...
Taxing CO2 is literally the last thing “the financial elites” want - it’s a policy that’s been pushed by scientists and economists for decades but never gained political traction due to an intense lobbying campaign from the oil and gas industry.
That’s also not what Thunberg advocates for. Thunberg primarily advocates for more aggressive national emissions reductions targets. She says that her drastic personal lifestyle changes (e.g. being vegan) are meant to raise awareness about environmentalism, but that they are not a practical solution and that the responsibility for eliminating pollution lies with the rich and powerful, not consumers.
> Taxing CO2 is literally the last thing “the financial elites” want - it’s a policy that’s been pushed by scientists and economists for decades but never gained political traction due to an intense lobbying campaign from the oil and gas industry.
Simply not true. "Scientists" didn't come up with carbon tax. Bankers did and they hired economists to peddle the idea.
> That’s also not what Thunberg advocates for. Thunberg primarily advocates for more aggressive national emissions reductions targets. She says that her drastic personal lifestyle changes (e.g. being vegan) are meant to raise awareness about environmentalism,
Ah yes, lets take advice from a 15 year old who knows absolutely nothing about anything. Climate fanatics scream "listen to the experts". Then then bring up a manipulated teen with obvious mental and emotional problems as their champion.
You say "the rich and powerful" aren't backing them and yet every major organization from the UN to World Bank is pushing the "vegan" nonsense not to mention carbon tax.
Remember "taxation without representation"? A global carbon tax is the epitome of that. So who is king george now and who are the ones advocating for it?
If there is going to be a global tax, there should be a global government which has authority from the global population. Not just from greedy financiers who want another financial assets to leech money from the masses to line their pockets.
How do your propose we manage the negative externality of co2 and ensure a good future?
A carbon tax in one way of internalizing the costs of co2 that are currently not borne by any of the relevant market participants. It can also be done in a revenue neutral way with a matching “carbon dividend” that is given back to the citizens.
Sorry to be nit picky, I get your greater point, but why do you say she’s “ill.” Seems like a precarious assumption and I’d assume that if this is verified by a psychologist they wouldn’t be announcing it to the world. Sometimes being angry is just being angry imho.
Yeah, when the entire worldwide MSM pushes a pretty(esque) child to bleat some establishmentarian message, watch out. There's nothing healthy about that scenario.
> A dangerous person would be some environmentalist that actually knows what he is talking about, and who is popular.
This danger is inactivated. Not anymore. The day before yesterday, I meet a guy that told me that he is being sued by "ecologist activities" [sic] (after annoying a Guardia Civil repeatedly denouncing furtive hunting, I think)... and a spanish judge accepted the case. Simply surrealist. It seems that being ecologist is now illegal in the European Union
He now must to pay in advance a 1000 euro legal bond, that obviously is the real objective here. To economically broke an environmentalist is really easy nowadays. If not you always can jail he/she abusing of a technical legal trivia
>their identification and management was fraught with legacies of bias, discrimination, and conflict. Following this, there was also a significant level of concern about their disruptive potential, and their powerful minds. This came to be negotiated by psychologists, families, schools, and in wider culture.
All the same fears and anxieties we have with AI now. Like the exact subject doesn't really matter as much as the process.
Good point about this sounding similar to AI fears.
The whole AI fear thing seems weird to me. Not impossible, but, just the level of hype around it combined with who is doing the hyping and now is strange. Kind of like the modern version of Victorian gentry prognosticating.
I’m surprised no one has chimed in with their own experience yet. I was in one of these programs (well, a moderate version of one, I didn’t skip grades or go to college young) and I remember being told all the time that we were the future leaders of the world. I became good friends with many of these people and really, we all turned out really normal. Not much different from folks not in those programs.
I think I’ll do more research on the history of these programs because I had no idea that it was a relic of WWII and the Cold War. Really interesting to me.
I didn't have any "gifted child" thing as a young kid (was homeschooled until high school, did quite well but not astronomically in high school).
However, thanks to scoring a 1510/1600 on the SAT and having good grades, I did get placed in a fairly prestigious cohort in college. My takeaway from that is that the person's natural talent is just one factor, and not even a particularly important one. It still takes a mix of actual work and capitalizing on good connections (in our case, we got hooked up with good connections thanks to being in this cohort) to get ahead. Maybe half of those kids that entered the cohort washed out or decided to go into other fields unrelated to the cohort (which I did). Some others got very normal jobs of no particular prestige. I know a handful that leveraged it into fairly prestigious jobs in our field.
My brother's another data point. He moved through grades in math at about 2x the rate of the rest of us, so clearly had a gift for it. He was tutoring college kids by high school and from then on has been making his living from math tutoring, including some gifted children of the early-college variety. What's a little strange to me is that he seems to have no natural ambition. It's like he's totally dialed into math tutoring to the exclusion of considering anything else. But if that's really his thing as it seems to be, then more power to him.
Also never been considered as gifted for my relatively normal IQ. However for a brief period during my teenage years, I suddenly became the top rank student in my school for an unknown reason that I still cannot comprehend. It was such an experience, as I was a normal student before that. I thought I was a genius who could ace any subject. I managed to enter top university with early admission for my good grades.
Too bad, I became 'normal' after that, discovered that a lot of people were smarter than me. It was a humbling experience of not being special anymore.
Nevertheless, I am still grateful for that brief experience. I have much more self confidence of my ability to solve any problem since then. Eventually I managed to subtitute my 'giftedness' with hard work.
I think, like many things, grade-skipping can either make sense or not make sense depending on the school, student, and classmates.
I skipped a grade in elementary school (joint decision between my parents, teacher, principal, and at least nominally myself!), and didn't suffer from any kind of bullying.
In my case, apparently I was actually creating trouble in my assigned grade, by being a chatterbox. I would finish my work early, and then proceed to hinder my friends' learnings by talking with them (understandably, because I was bored! you can only twiddle your thumbs or doodle for so long). Instead of punishing me, my teacher recommended me for skipping.
Through my extended family and their friends, I know many kids who are in the same circumstances these days: straight-A "troublemakers", especially in elementary school. But nowadays, skipping grades is seen as "unfair" rather than as a valid solution to a legitimate problem.
Because of something as arbitrary as their birthday, children are restricted from participating in a sufficiently challenging environment. I think we as a society are potentially trending too-rigid, especially in elementary school.
I have no comment on skipping 2 or more grades, though; I suspect the benefit of skipping grades drops off exponentially around 1 or 2 "skips", even for very gifted children.
First of all, bullying happens anyways. In fact, it's safer to assume that bullying is the norm rather than a deviance -- some are just better at being subtle than others. With that said, the gifted child is just as likely to treat that as a crash course in how to bully, in large part because they will inevitably become aware that penalties for bullying are more lax for them than for others, and they will be rewarded for figuring out how to outwit the system.
Bullying happens in most schools, but is there a correlation with skipping a grade? I don't think so.
Personal anecdote: I skipped a grade, and I was bullied. But I was bullied for a completely different reason. And there was one short kid in our class, so when people heard that "someone skipped a grade", everyone assumed it was him, not me. (As far as I know, he wasn't bullied.)
It remembers me "Time" by Stephen Baxter (1) with the brilliant kids, being influenced from the future to change present, and the fear reaction to them.
My brother was considered gifted. Several of my friends were also considered gifted. Almost all of them have done well enough but nothing really too out-sized or world changing. I know one that is now homeless and another that struggles to keep crappy jobs. From my perspective, the home environment and family values makes a bigger difference in your life later than your IQ when you are little.
I was tested and told I was gifted at 11. (IQ152) I had hippy parents who let me do anything. I left home at 15. I retired at 35 to pursue my life's work of being in service of tearing down and re-imagining the Global West pro-slavery democracy. Currently working in The Undercommons (Moten/Harney).
Interesting that this mentions the short story The Veldt, which is also dramatized as one of the radio plays in X Minus one that was on the front page yesterday.
> Yet instead, the precocious children lock their parents into a virtual reality room, where they allow them to be eaten by virtual – yet nonetheless carnivorous – lions.
I remember seeing this as an 80s or 90s scifi episode. The children disabled the safeties on a holodeck like system and fed their parents to the lions.
> or as dangerous future citizens who might use their unique talents to subvert authority.
...where the authority being subverted is that of a certain country's dominant social class that really doesn't like being told they're in the wrong...
----
More cynically though: almost all of the certified G&T folks I knew in school - and equivalents at university - gave up on their idealism and got degrees to become a city quant.
Except for one... he got into UW at 16 and had a head for epidemiology but was also interested in global geopolitics so he tried to major in both subjects at undergrad (uh-oh...) - but being so young at university in a course where social-networking is important meant he simply couldn't attend important events because he was below the drinking age. Anywya long story short he's now a water treatment plant operator and he tells me he's never been happier.