Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is cool, but I’m not sure it’s fair to claim it’s “faster” yet when it doesn’t do 95% of what jq does—-particularly the command line options. If it’s still faster when you can match 80% of the functionality, then it might be a claim worth making.


Exactly I didn't claim to be faster in all the cases, since there's no feature parity and I won't make it that way.

For the set of operations that I implement it it's faster, that's true.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: