Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> The K1 tablet was Nvidia trying to get rid of a bunch chips they were unable to sell.

Based on... what? The only reason there wasn't an X1 tablet was because of the exclusive deal with Nintendo.

I don't see Qualcomm out there making phones because they make far more money extorting others. If they didn't have the ability to push their patent portfolio down the throats of anyone who wants to make a phone that can actually connect to a cellular network, they would absolutely be making their own handsets.




> Based on... what? The only reason there wasn't an X1 tablet was because of the exclusive deal with Nintendo.

The fact that it's the same innards as an original Shield tablet, just rebranded and launched for a bargain basement price on what was supposed to be a flagship quality chip? A chip that didn't get any major users?

And can you cite this exclusive deal with Nintendo from somewhere other than a rumor site?

> I don't see Qualcomm out there making phones because they make far more money extorting others. If they didn't have the ability to push their patent portfolio down the throats of anyone who wants to make a phone that can actually connect to a cellular network, they would absolutely be making their own handsets.

Why would that stop Qualcomm? If they have so much pull and vertical integration is what you want to be doing, then why haven't they done that in addition to selling their chips to others? It makes sense for Samsung since they literally manufacture a great deal of the screens and other components anyway, and for Apple since they have the margins to pull it off. But it doesn't really make sense for anyone else except to dump extra inventory that you couldn't sell as glorified dev kits.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: