The supreme court is of the opinion that general welfare "has never been regarded as the source of any substantive power conferred on the Government of the United States or on any of its Departments."
And i have to say that’s a good opinion, if it was any other way you could basically make it mean anything. Wanting the constitution to mean that your position on one topic has to have broader considerations... if X is allowed with this argument what else would be?
"The supreme court is of the opinion that general welfare "has never been regarded as the source of any substantive power conferred on the Government of the United States or on any of its Departments.""
Well, that's ironic, as it goes against a plain reading of the Constitution.
Strict constructionists must be rolling in their graves.
And i have to say that’s a good opinion, if it was any other way you could basically make it mean anything. Wanting the constitution to mean that your position on one topic has to have broader considerations... if X is allowed with this argument what else would be?