Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Midnight Commander is nowhere near where Norton Commander was in terms of usability. Some of that is because of platform restrictions (terminal and keyboard access limitations) and some because of a difference in philosophy.

Norton Commander was simple, but it got the simple things right.



I don’t understand what you’re talking about — my terminal accesses as much from my keyboard as I’ve ever wanted it to, and everything I can imagine it wanting to short of flashing my (Num|Caps|Scroll) lock lights or something (and other terminals support more features than I even use, eg. image previews in ranger et. al.) Could you give an even more specific and concrete example?


While I don't like Midnight Commander's keybindings, do note that it can do quite a bit that Norton couldn't (e.g. ssh - incredibly handy).

If you want a closer clone to Norton Commander, try FAR Manager: https://www.farmanager.com/ (Windows only)


What exactly was so useable about norton commander? I tried a split fm and I just found it cumbersome.


When I still used Windows as my primary desktop, I found Total Commander to be very usable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: