On the opposite side of the spectrum, I love the (rarely-found) type of restaurant where you enter, and they start serving you food where you have no choice in the matter. Like some family joint in the middle of nowhere that people go to for what they know will exactly be served, as if at home.
Of course, that's probably out the window after all this settles down. Those types of restaurants are probably highly likely to fold.
Reminds me of this one restaurant in Paris I visited a few years back. We were kinda off the main drag and see this place with a long line way out the door so we decide to walk over and check it out. Saw a tasty looking steak being served and the line seemed to be moving pretty quickly so we decided to wait it out. We quickly realized that no one there spoke any English, and we basically spoke no French. But we were determined nonetheless to see what it was all about.
So we get to the front of the line and the hostess seats us. The waitress walks up to us and quickly realized we don't know any French. So in broken English she asks "rare or well done?". After getting all of our preferences she quickly comes back with wine and steaks with a side of this delicious green sauce.
We were all throughly impressed by the steak/sauce and quickness of service. My dad made a joke that the only thing that could make this better would be another round of steak. And low and behold a second round appears and we all laugh at the irony. All in all a great expirence, though I still don't know what that place was called nor what that sauce was, but it sure was tasty and a unique & fun expirence.
Single menu item steak frites restaurants are available in NYC and London and apparently Mexico City - https://relaisdevenise.com/ They import the secret sauce from France.
These restaurants also make it easy to split the bill as everybody has the same thing!
I just love restaurants that serve one or very few items even if they're small bodegas or a street cart. Being presented with a 12 page menu is off putting, and knowing a single place simply cannot serve 200 types of quality food (ingredients, cooking methods, etc.) is a significant part of that.
With a half a page menu I simply know the cook/chef specialized in that, and the ingredients have a better chance of being fresh and higher quality. One great sauce is 10 times better than a full menu of random choices.
Speaking of small restaurant: A few years ago I was visiting Vienna with my parents, where we strolled around the back alleys. There we found a small bakery[1] and across from that a small "Kaffeehaus" [2]. There we were able to literally buy some freshly baked bread/pastries from the bakery, walk 20m or so over and have breakfast with what we bought over there.
That is something you can barely ever find anywhere. It is also one of the reasons I try to avoid famous places and instead search out to the hidden parts of the city.
> I just love restaurants that serve one or very few items even if they're small bodegas or a street cart.
What's funny is NYC street carts, where the entire surface of the cart is covered in "menu," including hot dogs, sandwiches, burgers, gyros, salads, Philly cheese-steaks, literally anything you can imagine.
But they all _actually_ have only 3 menu items: Chicken over Rice, Lamb over Rice, and Falafel over Rice.
Huh, as a European I wonder what other things we take for granted that is simply uncommon in other parts of the world. It’s very easy to be “home blind”
One of my favorite dining experiences when travelling around Spain was in this small coastal town, going into a restarant and asking on the off chance if they had a menu in English, which they didnt and then just set out to order me a complete 7 course dinner of pheonominal food.
Before this I didn't like salmon sashimi, and one of the dishes was like beetroot cured (i think?) salmon tartare and it was delishish and finally put me onto sashimi
One of my favorite meals, ever, was like this, at 'House of Nanking' in SF. The host asked if the six of us had ever eaten there before, and when we said 'No', he said he'd take care of everything. Half a dozen dishes later (+/- 1 or 2, it was 20 years ago), we were amazed, happy, and full. 10/10.
How do you account for price in that situation? When I choose what I’m going to order at a restaurant, it’s not simply based on what I think would taste best, it’s about the ratio of price to tastiness. Whenever a waiter recommends something, it’s almost always one of the most expensive items on the menu. In fact at this point I avoid recommendations because I assume waiters are simply trying to optimize for profit and not actually what I would enjoy eating.
You're at a recommended restaurant that you're assuming won't screw you but you're also not very price sensitive. So, you don't want this if you're optimizing around price.
The opposite of this is common in restaurants in China, particularly rural restaurants. You enter and are invited into the kitchen area where you discuss what ingredients they have and approve suggestions for dishes. I enjoy it, though the pressure to make fast decisions can be overwhelming with the language barrier.
Isn’t this how high end michelin restaurants work? You sit down, eat the chef’s daily menu, and drop a few hundred dollars per person. You are there for the art of it and you trust the chef’s choice.
Some types, yes, although the service is at such a high level that they are usually accommodating far beyond what you'd expect.
The restaurant might have a 7 course tasting menu with fixed items on it for example, but if you say you're allergic to shellfish, they'll often not just remove the shellfish from your dishes, but re-engineer or fully replace the dishes that contain shellfish so that what you're getting isn't any _less_ than what someone eating shellfish would be having.
Ideally yes, although I think they end up cooking for the guide rather than their own tastes.
There is a possibly apocryphal story that Marco Pierre White was once asked for a plate of Chips, so he hand cooked them and charged the diner something like £100 for his time.
I used to do dinner parties like that at restaurants: remove choice from my friends and tell the server a list of things we'll get, and then we have a bunch of things on the table family style.
Don't worry about what can go wrong and live a little. It is an amazing experience for many.
One of my favorite places to eat growing up, and a favorite of my dads until the virus started, was a place like that that started as a halfway house.
Shared tables, food keeps being brought out in family sized bowls, serve yourself as much or as little as you like, pay when you leave. Some of the best veggies and probably the best biscuits I’ve ever had.
It was a great little egalitarian place, suits, white collar, manual labors, and ex-cons would be sitting around the table enjoying a meal.
I would always worry that I would get whatever is in surplus rather than whatever they think is good.
On the other hand, if everything they make is good then you’re fine and if their food is hit and miss then who’s to say you’d have a better chance of getting something good through analysis of the menu
Not sure why this is downvoted, it's a fair question in the US. Tipping culture is gross, and this is coming from someone who was a bar manager for a bit.
But to answer said question...
- You make a good recommendation, you get a good tip, that simple. Helping your table explore the menu + what they're into translates to happy customers and better $$$ for you later
- A lot of the high end items are loss leaders[1], part of the decoy effect[2], or are there just to round out the menu, e.g. how a seafood joint will have a steak or burger option for the spouse or kid or kosher person who doesn't do seafood.
- Front of house staff get told to push things depending on what's in stock or what is in season. Like, we have another shipment of meat arriving on Monday, so let's sell off as many braised spare ribs as possible to make space. A lot of our daily or weekly specials were based on what had to be tossed out in a week.
Servers are paid based on how much the customer tips, not based on the restaurant's profit margin. The fact that tips are done as a percent of the bill means that they're incentivized to point you at the more expensive side of the menu, but it's much more important to pick something that'll impress the patron than to maximize the size of the bill. The restaurant's margin doesn't directly factor into this at all.
If you think the specials at a restaurant are just designed to clean out the back of the walk-in, you shouldn't be eating anything there. By all means, though, order off the menu. Letting the server pick is a good play if you're optimistic about the restaurant.
For starters, in a lot of restaurants, (1) there's a set of dishes that are patron favorites, and (2) the servers make substantial amounts of money on tips. Their incentive is to make you happy with the experience.
In India, we have something called 'Bhojnalaya' that comes close to your definition. The options are fixed for the day, the food is prepared in the kitchen and served right outside their house.
I just visited a restaurant like this in Calabria a few days ago - you turn up and they just bring you food, most of which is produced by them or nearby. It was awesome. :)
This works well for me if the price is known in the beginning, but it probably necessarily varies. Perhaps itdoesn't matter in fine dining contects tho.
Minimalist menus would be the best thing to happen to most of restaurants. My favorite places are single page , single sided, list of perfected dishes. Especially the ones that change it up every couple of weeks. Less is more. I suggest anyone interested in that concept read "The Paradox of Choice". Too many options leads people to be overwhelmed and miserable by their choices.
I consider lack of choice in a restaurant a good thing, and I am not the only one.
And it is not just the paradox of choice.
Simply, if a restaurant offers 20 different dishes, it means each dish gets 20x less attention than if you had only one choice. Less fresh ingredients, less time perfecting the recipe and preparation. Serving only one dish makes things simpler and the restaurant is going to spend more energy making sure it is worth it.
About choice. When I go to a restaurant, I just want to eat something good. But I don't know what's good, it's not my specialty. But the chef is a specialist, he knows what's good, so I want to rely on his judgment as much as possible. Like everyone, I have personal tastes, but a good chef can easily make me change my mind about things I don't like.
Usually, what I think is the best is a 3 choice menu:
The specialty, the one that gets the most love and ideally the one everone should take.
The alternative, a completely different dish for those with different personal tastes.
And another, simpler dish for the picky eater. For example, it can be vegan if none of the other two are, free of allergens, kosher,... The idea is to not let that person down if part of a group.
>Simply, if a restaurant offers 20 different dishes, it means each dish gets 20x less attention than if you had only one choice. Less fresh ingredients, less time perfecting the recipe and preparation. Serving only one dish makes things simpler and the restaurant is going to spend more energy making sure it is worth it.
One of my favourite places has a decently sized menu (would say 40 items on there including starters/sides/deserts) while they aren't "the best" at anything, it's really good and I love the atmosphere.
I like the flexibility and that I can invite anyone there since the selection is varied and quality is reliable. I can't call my vegan sister to a smokehouse even if their ribs are the best I tried, can't take my wife to a fish restaurant but my friends could be in the mood for fish, I have no clue what my in-laws will want to eat when I have to take them somewhere, etc.
When I go to eat I go to eat X food item and the restaurant is only a means to the end. If they don't have X food I'll just go somewhere that does serve X.
I hear chef celebrities say the same thing but frankly, these kinds of restaurants usually disappoint me, and precisely because of the paradox of choice.
Good chinese restaurants are the literal opposite of that philosophy: multi-page menus with hundreds of choices.
I don't want to pick between a meat I want but cooked in a way I don't care for vs a meat I don't want as much but cooked in a way I prefer. And that's why the chinese restaurants with large menus excel: they pretty much have every possible permutation and then some.
I'd beg to differ. Really good Chinese restaurants in China tend to specialize ruthlessly, selling only a few items.
If anything, the "matrix menu" where you have X proteins in Y sauces for X*Y stir-fry combos is usually a "restaurant smell" indicating that they don't really care about the end product (satay salmon, anyone?).
> I'd beg to differ. Really good Chinese restaurants in China tend to specialize ruthlessly, selling only a few items.
What are you defining as "good"? Luxury restaurants?
Because I've been to hole in the wall restaurants in the middle of nowhere, and they'll have 20+ things on the menu and the food is generally delicious. I've been to higher end restaurants that have 8 pages or more. I've never seen anything with a tiny menu, except street stalls that only sell one or two items.
I'm definitely a person who prefers larger menus. Small menus make me worry more about what to order because it's usually 1 or 2 things I want, with 1 or 2 things I don't want in the same order. I also generally don't return because there isn't much else to try unless the few items are all appealing, which is rare. Longer menus at good restaurants keep me coming back to try new things.
Good = tasty! As a random example, Yang's Dumpling http://www.xysjg.com/ sells exactly one thing, shengjianbao dumplings, and all their outlets have lines out the door. Even the holes in the wall with 20+ items tend to focus on a well-defined theme, eg. you might have hand-cut noodles with a variety of toppings but little beyond that.
And yes, higher-end restaurants do tend to have longer menus, because in China these cater mostly to large groups and entertaining businessmen, and a key part of Chinese banquets is to order way too much food -- so much so that there's now an official CCP campaign to stamp out the practice.
I'd say 20 or 30 menu items is still a far cry from the usual American Chinese restaurant thing of four to six pages full of menu items in 8 point font.
My experience eating at hole-in-the-wall restaurants in Shanghai is that they put the menu up on a big board on the wall where everyone can see it. That tier of restaurant doesn't give you an individual menu. So the number of items is limited. You don't order a permutation of options; they list options and you order one of those. Some things come in multiple options (e.g. 孜然牛肉盖浇饭 "cumin beef served over a bed of rice", if present, is likely listed alongside 孜然羊肉盖浇饭 "cumin goat served over a bed of rice"), but those are just separate (adjacent) entries on the menu, not a "pick your meat" kind of thing.
Literally permutating sauces does indicate low quality but that's just because chinese cuisine has so much diversity that a decent restaurant can offer a large variety of flavor profiles without really repeating itself. Personally I'm not so picky to specifically want salmon satay, but I am able to define some parameters, e.g. heaviness (steamed/stir-fried/deep-fried), spiciness, texture, types of proteins, ratio of food groups, etc and find a suitable combination of menu items.
Specialized restaurants can certainly be better at specific dishes, but at the same time, the lack of options can be detrimental. For example, my kids won't enjoy a meal all that much in a place that specializes in spicy hot pots. Or maybe one person in the party will think the food is too heavy or spicy, etc.
Yes, permutations is the key word here. Mexican restaurants tend to have this kind of food - where they combine just a few different base ingredients (flour or corn tortillas, meats, cheeses, beans, rice, and various sauces and toppings) prepared in various ways and just call them different things, the permutations of which could be in the hundreds. Italian food is very similar in that regard. For this kind of food, having large, multi-page menus might make more sense.
I was recently at a Rainforest Cafe (not my first choice but it’s a good place to bring guests for entertainment value) that had just reopened and they had a simplified one-page menu. I was surprisingly pleased since they normally had pages and pages of items, so many in fact that I usually just chose the burger. And guess what was on the new menu? A burger. Of course.
There's definitely a place for restaraunts with bigger menus, especially when you're dining with kids or people who generally dont stray far from what they know. The probable gripe is when the restaraunt really sucks at making 80% of what's on the menu. Not always the case, but it does happen a lot.
Those picky people end up ordering the same exact thing off of every menu. Keep that as one of your ten options. Satisfy the boring people, and provide better service to people with some culture.
The book Freakanomics mentions that Westerners in groups tend to avoid picking the same thing to avoid looking too conformist (and the last people to pick are unhappy with their choice because they were railroaded into getting something odd like the Filet of Fish just to show they're their own person) while Asians tend to try to follow the herd even if it is not what they'd rather have.
A lot of food isn't that amazing, and some things some people just do not care for. You can dance around the preparation all you like, but I cannot stand the smell of eggs. Scrambled, over easy, whatever -- just the smell of them is terribly off-putting to me.
There's too much awful food in the world to force yourself to try all of it.
There’s a great Jazz club+Ethiopian restaurant in SF called Sheba that has “penne pasta” on their menu for people who want the Jazz but are too numpty to eat Ethiopian.
> If a restaurant is just going to make four or five dishes, it starts getting perilously close to places like Chipotle.
Not sure what you're on about here?
You're comparing bistros and restaurants with highly focused, individual dishes that they're perfected... with slop from a junk-food place like Chipotle?
No they're not. Have you eaten at Chipotle? No frozen ingredients. Everything is either made fresh there, or sous vide. No deep frying either (except for the taco chips.)
Is Chipotle classified as junk food place ? I find it better than most of the lunch places. Also I can kind of order a keto bowl without rice and beans.
I agree. People used to cook at home. Few restaurants could survive so they offered lots of variety. Now less people cook. The market can support more restaurants which should lead to more and more specialization.
The reverse z order mentioned in the article confirms what a friend of my wife who ran marketing for a regional chain said: the top right item on the first page will be the highest margin dish, normally pasta.
For years I would look and she was almost always right.
Japan and China both read left-to-right, just like we do. While some traditional texts are written vertically with lines proceeding right-to-left, that doesn't really carry over to general UI conventions. A set of three horizontal images would typically be understood as proceeding from left to right, for instance.
Arabic and Hebrew, on the other hand, are primarily RTL, and this does carry over to UI conventions. Menus might be laid out differently there.
Many soba restaurants use vertical text written right to left because it gives a sense of old times. Higher end traditional-style restaurants do this too.
Family restaurants and anything with western food is pretty much always written left to right.
It's also very common to see street signs (notably "construction ahead" and "beware of __" signs) using vertical right to left text.
Manga is normally right to left (both pages and lines) because it's written with vertical text. "learn statistics through manga" type books are left to right because they're written with horizontal text (because of formulas, etc.).
(I don't know if I agree with the comment you're responding to, by the way.)
It's irrelevant for computers because text on computers is basically always left to right though.
Horizontal text in modern Japanese is virtually always written left to right.
The primary exception is where the context of the writing itself implies a direction, e.g. text on the passenger side of a bus, or on a directional sign pointing to the left, may be written right-to-left so that the text "flows" in the same direction as its container. This would never be used for a longer text, though.
In Mainland China reading direction is mostly left to right, top to bottom now, just like in most European/American countries. I should go and see if the top right menu item is the one with the highest margins.
Only if by "western knowledge" you mean Communist Internationalism and its associated obsession with conformity. The change to left to right horizontal wasn't a natural development, it was forcibly imposed during the 20th century by communists. Given a choice people still prefer vertical (most novels and manga outside the mainland are still typeset vertically). It also has nothing to do with "technology". The first Japanese typewriter used vertical typesetting[0], websites in the Mongolian script use vertical typesetting[1]. It's sad to see people use technology to justify a global monoculture.
> The underlying reasons for this are financial: Restaurants can’t bother with low-margin dishes. They have fewer employees on the payroll, so they want to be more efficient with a smaller set of meals. They’re prioritizing fewer — and cheaper — ingredients.
I’m sure they are thinking about margins, but more generally, I think the issue is probably one of volume. If you have 25% as many people, maybe you remove unpopular items from the menu so that you aren’t ordering ingredients for them. For example, I have no idea whether oysters are high margin or not, but I suspect that people aren’t ordering them much for take out, so it doesn’t make sense to have them on the menu.
To expand on this a bit, multiple people in the business have told me that you can’t really buy much that only goes into one entree. So if you’re buying breaded chicken, it’s the same thing for your salads, your sandwiches/wraps, and any plated item. If one menu item isn’t moving, you can use your inventory on the others.
Obviously there are exceptions: Burger joints don’t need to do this with hamburger patties. Or you may buy a limited quantity of something you’re 100% sure is going to sell.
I wonder if the Cheesecake Factory and Applebees use A/B testing with their menus the same way Netflix uses A/B testing? There is probably a huge demand for data driven decision making for restaurants rather than these spares studies mentioned in the article which most likely are anecdotal. Simply have four different menus with the same items and look at the analytics provided by point of sale system. That is a fun start - up idea.
Most of your favorite restaurants in places like San Francisco, Portland, and New York City engineer their menu by removing least popular menu items once a month or once a season and replace them with what they think their customers currently demand at a price to insure that the restaurant is running at the point of highest efficiency. There are other considerations such a cost of product but most restaurants increase overall demand by using analytics from the point of sale system and the most profitable dishes are not always the most popular. Engineering a kitchen -- and dining room for that matter -- to be efficient without cooks tripping over each other is another whole discussion nonetheless even this ties into what can be added to the menu.
The two biggest mistakes an independent restaurant can make is hard coding a menu and putting the word in Bistro or Basserie in the restaurant name -- the restaurant can't evolve after that. Have any of you been to La Folie on Polk and Green in Russian Hill? That restaurant first opened as a casual French Bistro but the demand was for their caviar by the ounce and Tournedos Rossini which oddly enough was not only their most popular menu item but also not on the menu. So in the mid nineties the average customer was spending $150 - $300 instead of $40 per person.
They even have revenue forecasting models that take into account: weather, time of year, holidays etc and that article is from 2012.
PS I highly recommend that article for both the medicine to restaurant comparisons and the parallels one can draw to complicated systems in general like IT.
I just got back from a trip to Las Vegas and every single restaurant we went to had a QR code + online menu. Now, I am not sure if it was related to the reasoning stated here, but all the menus were also very short, with only a few items each. Personally, I was quite happy to view the menu on my phone. I know for a fact though my parents and grandparents would have hated such a thing.
If you went to higher-class restaurants, small menus are the norm. I'm no expert, and my wife only has a culinary degree from 10 years ago gathering dust, but some possible reasons:
- A smaller menu lets the chefs focus on learning to make those dishes at the expected level of quality. These items also usually require more skill and knowledge to just be passable.
- It's not so much that fancy places have small menus, as it is that non-fancy restaurants can have bigger menus. Their kitchens can have an assembly-line style that optimizes simplicity and time, letting them hire cheap cooks. When every dish is "throw each part in the oven/fryer/pot, wait 10 minutes, put on plate," adding 50 dishes doesn't put as much strain on the cooks.
They're just Sysco resellers... the second highest margin items on menus are desserts, which are almost always Sysco microwave desserts or similiar preps.
The very short menu is an interesting change as well. It makes sense in a couple of ways I think. First it signals that they've really thought about what you should have and that they are super practiced at making it. Second it makes things cheaper and operationally simpler for the restaurant. I'm not sure which of those is a bigger deal.
There's diminishing returns when you cook the same thing over and over. People that are excellent cooks on round 1 aren't going to be a whole lot better on round 500 than they are on round 100. Also, they often rotate the short menu.
In San Francisco everywhere has QR codes and the same format.
Had wine and charcuterie: food and separate drink menu on two different QR codes.
It's not perfect, many times the checkout system is haphazard, doesn't make use of Apple Pay or anything built into the phone. Requires user to input their table number into the checkout process.
Or its just a surrogate for normal waiter / server experience and they come up to you eventually (which is fine).
People all seem willing to tolerate the experience, and all the older luddites and technophobes are still in their prepper bunkers or just not in the city.
Interesting how much the last decade of technology and proliferation has prepared us for this. QR codes, mobile phones, highly available high speed internet. Just going back 10 years in many major cities, even San Francisco and New York, this would have been much much worse to adjust to.
My restaurant has been trying to implement a contactless ordering & checkout system since the initial shutdown in CA back in March. Our CEO refuses to open, even for takeout, until our dining experience is seamless. The trouble is is that nowhere has a completely seamless order-and-pay-from-your-phone system because it doesn't exist.
We've been working with one company that has integrated their web-app with our existing POS, but there's a lot of bugs with some wonky workarounds that we aren't comfortable with. They've been developing new features for us for months at no cost due to their pandemic program, however it's just not up to our CEO's expectations.
Now we're looking into switching to a completely new, modern POS that supposedly has a working order/pay from your device feature. Trouble is, the entire check has to be ordered (drinks, appetizers, entrees, desserts) all at once and paid for before it even gets sent to the kitchen. This is what the other company we've been working with has been trying to set up for us - guest sits down, scans the QR on their phone, orders at their own pace and checks out whenever they're ready - this is how our restaurant has been set up from day 1. We previously had iPads with a custom iOS app that the guests could order from. Our CEO believes this won't be an acceptable system moving forward as shared iPads aren't seen as sanitary as personal phones.
> Our CEO refuses to open, even for takeout, until our dining experience is seamless. The trouble is is that nowhere has a completely seamless order-and-pay-from-your-phone system because it doesn't exist.
Having spent significant time in the Industry, in both Europe and the US, I honestly think this is exactly what will give Ghost Kitchens the edge over the traditional dine-in places.
>a completely seamless order-and-pay-from-your-phone system because it doesn't exist.
(disclaimer: founder) Yes, this is literally what Zerocontact does. Contactless waitlist, menu, order, pay. Hybrid ordering so staff and guests can add items to one check. Fully supports courses. Add dessert at the end of th meal. Still, the customer has one check to pay (apple pay or google pay, or CC). We may even support your legacy POS or you can use ZC in standalone mode. It's a full order-management system for contactless on prem and off prem dining.
Website and service looks solid - would have definitely reached out had I seen this 6-8 weeks ago (and if our legacy POS wasn't such a disaster already).
We're negotiating with Toast at the moment since the offer the whole deal, hardware included, other than the ability to leave the guests' tab open once their order is started from their own device.
Good luck, I can imagine the cognitive dissonance. Many of their contracts dangle cheap / free hardware with expensive services and hidden over-priced processing in a bundled SAAS. And yet feature wise, it "does it all" except the very things you want it to do. (coursing and hybrid (open tab) ordering, and good guest experiences like apple pay on checkout). So you upgrade into something supposedly better but not actually what you wanted. If you get stuck, DM me (name in profile) and we can help you out with a full solution that actually does all the stuff. We've done >$1B orders so this is easy for us.
okay what are the non-derogatory but also accurate words here? I am aiming to use language to convey a message for:
"a person opposed to new technology or ways of working."
and
"a person who fears, dislikes, or avoids new technology."
which is literally a copy and paste job from the definitions on google.
They are older than the people going out.
edit: ahhh if that one irreconcilable line dilutes my message for people here I don't really care enough about this conversation to placate whoever that got the attention of. I added to the discussion maybe others have a relatable experience. Moving on.
The QR shit is annoying. I'm young, but having to keep picking up our phones to look at menus and getting distracted by them is exactly why I go to a restaurant in the first place: human experience. Purely consuming food can be done at home.
Also, my wife's phone was low on battery so we were on a clock. This sucked. They had batteries but no cables for an Android phone.
It's not a bad idea. I mean, you still see these long lines at In'n Out, and it's funny because they're all buying the exact same item. We'll there's maybe 2 possible main courses, but by and large it's people buying different toppings of a cheeseburger and fries.
That business model probably did well for McDonalds when they first opened their doors. All of these restaurants have that identity too.
Wendy's - Square Burgers
Carl's Jr. Double Western Bacon
IHop - Stack of cakes
I mean it's very reasonable for most restaurants to take this time to go back to identity restaurants instead of catering to the picky people, which, let's be honest, are the ones that stopped eating out when Covid hit.
In San Francisco everywhere has QR codes and the same format.
I've had wine and charcuterie: food and separate drink menu on two different QR codes.
It's not perfect, many times the checkout system is haphazard, doesn't make use of Apple Pay or anything built into the phone. Requires user to input their table number into the checkout process.
> Enlisting the magic number for items per food category. At fast-food joints, it’s 6; for snazzier joints, it’s 7 appetizers/desserts and 10 main courses.
My first gut reaction to those stated prices was that the consultants hadn't adjusted their prices for inflation for at least a decade.
But then I looked at the (current menu) prices of the restaurants I went to in college and also my hometown (both in low-cost parts of the Midwest). It was only then that I realized NYC has made me accustomed to much higher prices.
Those numbers are substantially accurate in my college town and hometown. Meanwhile those numbers need to be adjusted upwards by 50-100% for NYC.
EDIT: My skimming of the article was poor; the quote refers to number of items per category not price per item per category. My anecdote remains true though.
This article perfectly describes the types of menu that I loath to see at restaurants. It’s not an exaggeration when I say I always complain about these menus in person whenever I encounter them because I find them so hard to read. But question is… do these gimmicks subconsciously still work on me?
I am loving the QR menus, especially ones that offer check out. For one thing, I almost always feel compelled to go wash my hands after ordering, since menus are known to be some of the most germ ridden things out there. Besides that though, restaurants could do some many cool things with this. For example, it would be trivial to offer photos of every dish. The next level could be item-item recommendations (people who order X, also like Y).
My wife always insists that we not handle any of our cutlery until we’re finished handling the menu and we’ve either used hand sanitizer or washed our hands. [1]
Unfortunately, mobile phones are also notoriously dirty [2], so we still wash after handling those as well.
This mostly rings hollow based on my experience as a diner and chef. The menu graphics especially; I read boxes last if at all, the most expensive item at every place I've worked sells quite well, unusual ingredients and dishes don't sell well, and why on Earth would I read the right side of a folding menu first?
Making menus smaller is a good idea in general. Every restaurant rescue show I watch recommends this. However, there's a better idea for more profitability: make portions smaller.
I was at a restaurant in Houston and they ordered the dishes in each section by size (I.e. the appetizers started with the smallest dish and worked their way up in size)
One thing I do not miss since not going to restaurant, not having to pick between ten items on the menu and trying to figure out how much the service charge will be.
The unfortunate fact is that if you’re a restaurant owner (putting aside ultra high-end for the moment) if you want to increase revenue, you can either turn tables faster or increase the check size, if you raise prices people either want higher quality or better value - quality tends to be lower margin, so restaurants usually opt for value (bigger portions)...which is not the best for our waistlines
The "change" I want to see in the world of menus is this: List desserts in order of size ! Biggest to smallest. Usually desserts are such a rip-off at restaurants, but when I do indulge, I want the biggest :)
It feels to me like QR codes for public use have completely died. They exploded about 5 years ago while people would just scan marketing posters for the gimmick of scanning a qr code but I doubt anyone does that anymore.
A lot of people in the US don't even know how to scan a QR code, and for the longest time (maybe still now?) the most popular mobile phone OSes didn't come with a built-in scanner.
I presume you're talking about America, since I can assure you that in Asia QR codes are alive and well. In China in particular everything is done with QR.
I'm talking about Australia here but I imagine its the same in both countries. QR codes used to be on every poster but now the only place I see them is on the front of the apple store so you don't have to walk in (which is a process right now)
I think what killed them here is that android didn't bundle a qr code scanner by default and they never contained anything that the user actually wanted, they were just for marketers to get people on their site.
TFA calls out Cheesecake Factory's menu directly: the goal is for patrons to get confused, ask the server what to get, and let the server direct them to more expensive/higher margin options.
Under "capitalism", the aim of menu design is to maximise profits for the restaurant owner.
Imagine a system that maximises the health and happiness of patrons, the enjoyment and satisfaction of work by employees, and the sustainability of the business.
The people who build it will need more than menu design.
Embarrassing reading. I find it hard to believe there's a "science" to menu design that has its own "experts" who don't mention a thing about typography or graphic design. The Z pattern is simply related to the language the menu is set, which for languages of latin origin (and obviously many others) is left-to-right, top-to-bottom. Adding boxes for attention does the opposite most of the time because people will read text in that same fashion. Meaning that if you place a box between two text blocks, it's easier to jump over the box and continue reading the block below than having to find the (now indented) first line inside the box and then having to find the first line of the block below once again. The box breaks the pattern your eyes have been following up to that point. And on, and on, and on...
Of course, that's probably out the window after all this settles down. Those types of restaurants are probably highly likely to fold.
By the way, here's a funny parody of "every trendy restaurant menu": https://www.eater.com/2014/7/24/6181765/heres-what-every-tre...