That's not rambling at all.
No matter what you believe about humans -- that we have a soul or we are (just) very complex biological machinery, in the end, everything scientists do, do for human kind.
High achieving scientists tend to start by focusing on logic and "reason", and that's why they become high achieving.
But there is no reason not to explore our humanness later in life.
Even if MBTI is regarded as pseudoscience, as an INTJ, I know that later in life I must explore and improve my not so developed soft skills, and it only feels natural.
I, and everyone I know, have found the enneagram to be much more predictive and comprehensive of people's behaviour and how they think. (And much more helpful too)
High achieving scientists tend to start by focusing on logic and "reason", and that's why they become high achieving.
But there is no reason not to explore our humanness later in life.
Even if MBTI is regarded as pseudoscience, as an INTJ, I know that later in life I must explore and improve my not so developed soft skills, and it only feels natural.