Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Seems very risky. Not something I’d want to do if minimum downtime was the goal. One wrong piece of gravel ends up with catastrophic failure instead of 5 minutes of downtime.



But the goal was zero downtime, not minimum downtime. The client made it clear that 5 minutes of downtime was equivalent to catastrophic failure. So they correctly found a solution that reduced the chance of "5 minutes of downtime", at the expense of an increased risk of catastrophic failure.


I understand that. I just doubt that the risk was worth it, if downtime is such a big deal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: