Given I've quoted the article before on this thread, I can only assume you're acting in bad faith when insinuating I haven't read the article.
With that said, as the article states, Facebook temporarily complied only after the judge increased the sentence with a threat of imprisioning staff.
Facebook is paying lawyers out their own pockets to appeal as per article:
> "Given the threat of criminal liability to a local employee, at this point we see no other alternative than complying with the decision by blocking the accounts globally, while we appeal to the Supreme Court," it said.
https://time.com/5874695/facebook-blocks-accounts-worldwide/
Seems to me that, yet again, a service provider complies with court rulings requesting that illegal content should be taken down.