Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> When we built Skype of Xbox One, we worked on a barebones Xbox OS, that was missing key libraries. We were building one of the first full-fledged applications on the platform. We needed a navigation solution that we could hook up both to touch gestures and to voice commands.

That makes sense. I would expect one to implement data structures and algorithms in a new operating system / kernel without the presence of any libraries available, except for libc, so that they can be reused or abstracted elsewhere in the kernel, drivers etc.

> There were cases where we had to build our own encryption / decryption implementations, formally verifying and auditing them, in the absence of the framework supporting it, or audited libraries being available.

I would leave implementing cryptographic protocols to the professional cryptographers.

But overall, I agree with the author to ask about data structures and algorithms that are actually used in the company if I were interviewing a candidate. It gives an honest account of the engineering decisions and reasons made in the team as to how implementing this DS & A helped them solved their problem and to test if the candidate understands these concepts.

However, after asking the candidate to implement a DS or A, if the candidate questions the technical interviewer if they use it in the company / teams and the answer is no, then it seems rather than a dishonest ego trip on the interviewer's side to test the candidate if they know the secret konami code.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: