> Some can land in some conditions.

So... a bit like a Tesla parking itself in some conditions?

I hope you really don't think it's a good comparison. The level of effort and safety engineering that went into ILS Cat IIIb and Autoland is above and beyond what any automotive company is doing. Autoland is mandatory in certain conditions.

Perhaps, but I've already responded to you addressing this, in this thread. The public's ignorance must be considered; being "technically correct" isn't good enough if the "technically correct" statement is being made by somebody who has every reason to believe it will be misunderstood.

To add: saying that your marketing is "technically correct" while focussing on the general audience is quite convenient (deceptive).

Requires total coordination and compliance from both stationary and moving parts of the system, and operator is supposed to take over immediately, continuing the manouevre, at the sign of any trouble?

Yeah. That's almost completely unlike a Tesla parking.