Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

i'm a little confused why this article doesn't also bring up the other high profile supreme court scraping case - the HiQ LinkedIn case (https://www.natlawreview.com/article/hiq-files-opposition-br...)

Why does the Supreme Court seem to be considering these two related cases together? seems like duplication?



This case is really really specific. LinkedIn did not owe the data of people who posted it there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: