Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There's a big difference between

"On Thursday, the company said that as its select partners release the first tablets based on Android "Honeycomb" – the latest version of its mobile operating system – it will not open source the Honeycomb code."

And "But there was no indication that the code wouldn't be promptly open sourced as the first devices were released. What's more, Google did not make a public announcement that it will keep the source closed. "

I'd be surprised if Google has manged to rid every last piece of GPL'd software from the OS. Otherwise, they're going to have to release the source.

Check here for updates http://source.android.com/




> I'd be surprised if Google has manged to rid every last piece of GPL'd software from the OS. Otherwise, they're going to have to release the source.

They have to release source to the GPL parts (WebKit, the kernel and stuff that links directly to it, like drivers and possibly other stuff they use). From their glibc-like Bionic and up (including the userland, Dalvik), everything is BSD-style and they have no obligation whatsoever to release anything. Not even to manufacturers.


> everything is BSD-style

Nitpick: it's actually the Apache license (which isn't that far from BSD), but your point is of course correct.


FYI, Webkit is not GPL. There are pieces in LGPL, and the majority is a BSD license.


I stand corrected. KHTML is LGPL not GPL.


I'd be surprised if the GPL parts were not already published as soon as HC tablets started shipping.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: