But you're not following the analogy. You just took it word for word and attacked something that wasn't even the point of it. You may as well have said "but websites aren't made of sugar".

I made concrete points on why websites shouldn't be trusted with such access. You did more of what was shown before, rattled the trinkets. And the use cases you listed don't seem like something you can't achieve now with existing APIs or dedicated apps, which makes more sense.

Stands to prove that the point of the analogy is more appropriate than ever: people can't understand the problem, let alone the solution.