Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I assume you're talking about solar-powered ion engines, as solar panels cannot on their own move a spacecraft appreciably.

The big difference there is thrust. Ion engines are efficient but have very low thrust, so it can take months to change your orbit. Chemical and nuclear propulsion is high thrust, so we're talking minutes instead. Nuclear has higher propellant (i.e. mass) efficiency than chemical as well.




No, solar thermal can generate similar thrust to nuclear, using less mass. Nuclear only really makes sense past Jupiter.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: