Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

With all of the security issues surrounding Intel CPUs in the last couple of years, not having an Intel processor will be a real advantage for Apple. And competition is a good thing.



If your impression was that modern ARM CPUs weren't affected, I have some bad news for you:

https://wiki.netbsd.org/security/meltdown_spectre/


That chart doesn't include Apple's implementations, but they were some of the relatively few non-Intel CPUs to be affected by Meltdown as well as Spectre.


My gut tells me to trust Apple more than Intel on security. As far as I know there is no perfect security.


A lot of these security issues have lead to fixes that have had a negative impact on performance. There's no way that hasn't bothered Apple.


Those are kind of fundamental to multicore / multithreaded CPUs, not just Intel. If I have many tasks running on the same CPU, tasks can interact in complex ways. That can leak traces of information, and a clever enough person can pry that tincan open.

Not much one can do about it, other than running untrusted tasks in a sandbox with very well-controlled performance. That means slow performance.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: