I thought about 6 months whether I should call companies out if I'm really unhappy with their recruiting process. I decided the potential increase in transparancy is worth the risk.
I once applied to ING (the biggest Dutch national bank). They gave me a test like this and rejected me because I'm not responsible enough.
The irony is that I was complimented on my responsibility when I was an instructor on a coding school. This was especially in light of all the other teachers resigning because they couldn't cope with their classes.
I told ING this. I told them I'd work for free for 3 months, so they can try me out. Nope, I'm too irresponsible, no matter that I completed my 4 academic study programs in time with high marks and did extracurricular stuff.
It is bullshit indeed. IMO, the real answer is: it seems that Mettamage is responsible based on his past accomplishments. Based on the questionnaire he doesn't rank his responsibility a lot lower compared to the average person. Time will tell whether he is responsible.
I once applied to ING (the biggest Dutch national bank). They gave me a test like this and rejected me because I'm not responsible enough.
The irony is that I was complimented on my responsibility when I was an instructor on a coding school. This was especially in light of all the other teachers resigning because they couldn't cope with their classes.
I told ING this. I told them I'd work for free for 3 months, so they can try me out. Nope, I'm too irresponsible, no matter that I completed my 4 academic study programs in time with high marks and did extracurricular stuff.
It is bullshit indeed. IMO, the real answer is: it seems that Mettamage is responsible based on his past accomplishments. Based on the questionnaire he doesn't rank his responsibility a lot lower compared to the average person. Time will tell whether he is responsible.