I said the infringement was going to be inconsequential.
Yes, but you've given no evidence to support your position. It just seems to be your personal view/assumption.
The more you try to prevent copyright infringement, the more it is justified.
Someone is doing you harm in an illegal way, and you take steps to protect yourself from the damage, and that makes it more justified for them to do you harm in an illegal way? That's not exactly a strong moral or legal argument.
What kind of content?
Educational and uncontroversial. But in a niche market, where creating good original content requires real work by dedicated people because most people aren't going to do it, and where someone setting up some copycat site in China or India really does pose an existential threat to the viability of the business.
Yes, but you've given no evidence to support your position. It just seems to be your personal view/assumption.
The more you try to prevent copyright infringement, the more it is justified.
Someone is doing you harm in an illegal way, and you take steps to protect yourself from the damage, and that makes it more justified for them to do you harm in an illegal way? That's not exactly a strong moral or legal argument.
What kind of content?
Educational and uncontroversial. But in a niche market, where creating good original content requires real work by dedicated people because most people aren't going to do it, and where someone setting up some copycat site in China or India really does pose an existential threat to the viability of the business.