Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"But missing the point. If I am worried about privacy from cloud players, why to trust another cloud player?"

The workflow I am (not quite finished) setting up is as follows - I run a caching, recursive nameserver (unbound) in my own colo space. That DNS server, not me or my devices, is the nextDNS client.

Then I set all of my own networks and devices to use my (unbound) DNS server.

My goal is to receive all of the benefits of a paid nextdns account, but on the nextdns side, all they see is a single, fixed IP, in a fixed location, owned by a corporate entity, doing a bunch of DNS queries.

In fact, I am a bit worried about this exact setup because although I am using this for my own, personal use, consistent with their expectations, I could just as easily be a full-blown ISP passing through my nameservice to nextDNS ... how do they deal with that ?

Do they care ?




Totally guessing here. If they saw one IP making ISP-rate queries they could contact you and negotiate a different price. Even with caching you are very likely going to see much higher query rates occasionally when a whole network of people are using it.


You personally make a many DNS queries as a full-blown ISP? The fact that your server does it's own caching may keep your query rate lower than others.

I'm sure they can refuse service to customers in certain cases.


No, I wouldn't make anywhere near that number of DNS requests, but the setup would be the same - a caching, forwarding nameserver doing a MITM between my networks and nextDNS.

So I assume they allow (or, rather, can't really disallow) such a setup but I wonder what ramifications it has when someone decides to front their entire customer base behind their nextDNS acount ...


I'd assume they would just ask them to stop.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: