I was curious, how does Surfboard compare to Librosa?
It looks like Surfboard is a wrapper combining feature extraction methods from Librosa and other libraries, plus some of its own implementations. Is that correct?
> Surfboard actually builds on LibROSA for a few of its components (e.g. MFCCs) and its functionality (e.g. loading .wav files into memory). In that sense it is the same as LibROSA for a lot of their communal functionality.
> LibROSA was built to extract individual components for music analysis. The components we built into Surfboard are largely different to those in LibROSA (apart from a few). If you are interested, please read our paper and documentation to find out more!
Also pretty useful is Essentia [1]. It's created by the guys at Universitat Pompeu Fabra and designed for use both in research (for things like Music Information Retrieval) and in industry (iirc it's used in a guitar tuner app and a few other things). Written in c++ with python wrapper, pretty cool!
Sure. I wish they'd put a bit more work into the name. Maybe I'm thickheaded since I can't get over the word association each time I read, "Surfboard".
Hi there,
Author of the paper here! We chose Surfboard because 1) it's a fun name and 2) surfers ride waves, and Surfboard works with WAVEforms. That's it really :D
It looks like Surfboard is a wrapper combining feature extraction methods from Librosa and other libraries, plus some of its own implementations. Is that correct?
https://github.com/novoic/surfboard/blob/master/COMPONENTS.m...