Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

One workaround is the use of Fresnel lenses. This is featured in Canon's DO (Diffractive Optics) line of lenses.

Another 'workaround' is the use of a mirror, but these lenses are only useful for very specific tasks and are usually not designed for the high end market.




You can always identify photos taken with mirror lenses because out-of-focus highlights look like donuts.


Interesting, will have to look at Canons DO lenses, not heard of them before.


Nikon's PF lenses, of which there are only 2 (300mm f4 PF and 500mm f5.6 PF) are worth a look too. I have the 300PF and it's smaller and lighter than a 24-70mm and plenty sharp. The 500PF has been sold out since launch.

https://i.imgur.com/o4kNzNy.jpg


I have had the 70-300 DO for about 12 years and find it to be a lackluster lens and seldom use it (never).

https://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/70-300mm-do-is.htm

I agree with Ken Rockwell's review of the lens except I add that it just doesn't have the color and contrast "pop" of equivalent lenses such as the 100-400 L II zoom. One thing, though, the used price for the DO lens is low.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: