From my quick reading, it sounds like he's proposing that there is no such thing as "nothing", that what we call "nothing" is in fact like an empty set. There's still something there.
I kind of see what he means - in his view, it is turtles all the way down, and the bottom turtle, what seems to us empty, is made of the same being/existence.
It takes 1-bit to store the state “nothing” vs “something” — so it’s a question of information content — whether or not it is perceivable information is what we traditionally use to delineate existence vs. non existence.
I kind of see what he means - in his view, it is turtles all the way down, and the bottom turtle, what seems to us empty, is made of the same being/existence.