What? I don't understand how this is relevant at all to my post. Why do you think I am calling something out of context? What do you think we disagree about? You need to explain what you think I said, because I have no idea if it's something I actually said.
Let me summarize my point of view again, very simply:
You are allied with userbinator in saying that it is not "perfectly safe and drivable", despite the quibbles about exactly how it fails that test.
Especially because you're saying "It's safe assuming you won't keep driving it." and they're saying "If you keep driving it, it's not safe.", and both of those can easily be true at the same time.
Let me summarize my point of view again, very simply:
You are allied with userbinator in saying that it is not "perfectly safe and drivable", despite the quibbles about exactly how it fails that test.
Especially because you're saying "It's safe assuming you won't keep driving it." and they're saying "If you keep driving it, it's not safe.", and both of those can easily be true at the same time.