This "dangerous surveillance bill" is the status quo. Not to say that it is acceptable, but please realize that there's no new powers being granted, just old ones being renewed that expired this week.
Also, are we really allowing articles from Common Dreams now?
It may be the status quo, but since these powers were intended to be temporary, it is arguably relevant that they may finally be expiring. Many users here care about issues around surveillance and privacy.
Re: Common Dreams, HN guidelines don't limit sources by their political slant, as long as the article in question is interesting or relevant. Frankly I find this to be refreshing, since many places are dominated by articles from sources with a center-right slant.
Also, are we really allowing articles from Common Dreams now?