The statement is inaccurate any way you slice it. Why use incomplete information when more is available?
The statement was accurate. It may not be a useful metric, but it was an accurate one.
But it's also not the case when looking only at absolute numbers either. I would also argue that per capita is implied because it's the only way you can really make that comparison.
The statement is inaccurate any way you slice it. Why use incomplete information when more is available?