Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's the "up to" bit that I take issue with.

It's a half-life thing. The larger your initial sample, the longer the sample can go and still have enough infectious ability left.

Scenario: Infected person sneezes over a large area and deposits over a wide area. Then you come by 6 hours later and touch a deposited surface and then 10 minutes later touch your eyes.

Each transition only picked up a fraction of what was left.

And each time period left only a fraction of what was there.

More important to limit travel, limit direct/close contact and clean commonly used surfaces frequently.

And better to avoid replicating the environmental conditions that created the "up to 9 day" figure: low temperatures and low humidity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: