If I don't like someone's indenting I just reflow the piece of code. No biggie. These kind of rules are what turns me off of corporate gigs. It eventually leads to having to type .equals() instead of = (or == if you use an imperative language). Or the banning of the ternary operator.
If you reflow the code, what are you going to do when you check it back in to version control?
Are you going to check it in as you've reflown it, with your own indenting? If you do, and the reflowing substantially changed the indents, that could make the change you made harder to diff against (and possibly piss off the guy who's code you've re-indented).
Alternatively, you could indent it back to the way it was before you checked out the code.. that's kind of a pain in the butt, though (even with automatic indenting tools, which don't always get quite everything right).
One possible solution is an "indent-on-commit" plugin. It pisses off EVERYONE equally =)
It does get around some of this though; you don't have the diff issues, and everyone can indent how they like. Those that choose to use the same settings as the auto-indenter get pissed off the least. It's not ideal, but I think it does a reasonable job of at least minimizing the standard deviation of pissoffedness by spreading it around.
You'd have to be fascist about everyone using the same pretty-printer settings, or every commit will appear to be a rewrite and features like "blame" will be useless. Better to only reformat lines you're changing anyway, if the whitespace is messy enough to bother (e.g., alternating tabs and spaces).
