Ok. Would you accept "_potentially_ insecure protocol" then? DNSSEC for example ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		andyjohnson0 on Feb 25, 2020 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Mozilla’s DNS over HTTPs Ok. Would you accept "_potentially_ insecure protocol" then? DNSSEC for example provides no encryption. fwiw I agree with you about a central body getting all out DNS requests.

mulmen on Feb 25, 2020 [–]

The problem is this language spreads FUD around DNS and then offers a “solution” with additional problems.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact