Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Maybe we need a comment DAG instead?

HN comments are a DAG. DAGs are branchy, which is the problem. It seems like you want to merge or rebase the two comments and then reply with a new node pointing to the last of them.




> HN comments are a DAG.

Come on don’t be pedantic you know what I mean - I mean a DAG that is not also a tree - so using the merging property of a DAG.

If HN were a DAG then I could make this reply to your comment and someone else’s on another part of the discussion at the same time.

> merge or rebase

These are source control terms - I’m not sure how they apply here.


> These are source control terms - I’m not sure how they apply here.

Git is a DAG too.


Hacker news comments are a restricted DAG where a node can't have multiple parents. Obviously they're referring to that property.

The branches could come back together again.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: