Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

These posts are great and there is always great information in them. But to nitpick, it would be a lot easier to digest on face value if you lead with concurrency rather than raw total users as that's the true gauge of how your server infrastructure looks like.


Yeah I still don’t understand the need to split servers at 10 users. Even if this is in parallel, it must still mean there is a well-beyond-average resource consumption per user.


Probably so when your 10 users grow to 1000, your efforts at 10x are good for 1000x, and you’re working on 100000x.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: