Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Holy shit. The parent comment is as disingenuous as the implication they’re putting the author of the article. It earned a very rare HN downvote from me.



Looks like they changed the disclosure at some point. The original version of the article is here: http://archive.is/QCmA6


Thank you! I tried using internet archive but somehow it wasn't loading the page properly. I was going a bit insane, but remembered it's just the internet and moved on.


I can confirm that the article was edited. It said exactly what the parent comment wrote when I read it.

This IMHO makes it even worse. The article should clarify that they updated this description.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: