Just for fun and to make a point, I threw your reply into Talk to Transformer.
> This is something so many people miss when trying test the limitations of GPT-2. It just doesn't make sense to test it on strings of text that nobody ever writes. To me, the best way to evaluate the usefulness of GPT-2 is to compare it to some actual test that validates a lot of its claims. So... let's do just that.
It might be just chance, but gee -- is this text referring to its own generation as a test to convey a point? The self-referentiality is formidable.
> This is something so many people miss when trying test the limitations of GPT-2. It just doesn't make sense to test it on strings of text that nobody ever writes. To me, the best way to evaluate the usefulness of GPT-2 is to compare it to some actual test that validates a lot of its claims. So... let's do just that.
It might be just chance, but gee -- is this text referring to its own generation as a test to convey a point? The self-referentiality is formidable.