Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Those are references to Microsoft PAC which is funded by small donations from thousands of employees. Folks sometimes donate small amounts because they can go to events where interesting speakers are invited like Michael Lewis, Phil Knight, Will Smith, Chelsea Clinton, Arianna Huffington etc. As an employee, you do not have a say in capital allocation. In fact the PAC donates to both sides. The only agenda historically is what is in Microsoft’s corporate interests from taxation policies to h1bs etc. Representatives didn’t always fall cleanly into either camp. For example, while McConnell might be a climate denier he might have supported a favorable taxation policy, rural broadband policy or h1b policy. Perhaps Schumer supported favorable h1b policies but not corporate tax policies so he would be allocated capital proportionally.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?cycle=2020&strI...

47% Dem 53% Rep split.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00227546&c...

It was a very bizarre and independent function. After employee frustration, they suspended the PAC

https://www.geekwire.com/2019/internal-email-microsoft-suspe...




The employee PAC was suspended temporarily. It's operating again AFAIK. (Disclaimer, ex MS.)


Such corporate-managed PACs should be made illegal.

I may not be able to come up with the perfect solution myself, but I'm sure there is a way to maintain regular people's ability to organize and even donate politically without having greedy corporate interests take over such entities. Politicians should work to find that solution and ban everything else.

There is just so much wrong with the U.S. electoral system, it's hard to even know where to start. Money in politics, the FPTP system (which also helped the pro-Brexit party in UK win the most seats again, despite the majority of votes going to anti-Brexit parties), electoral college, antiquated caucus system in primaries, all the technical obstacles that two parties have set against independents and third-parties to ensure they never have a real shot and that the real status-quo is maintained (permanent war, helping their wealthy friends, spying on everyone, keeping citizens in the dark about the real issues, etc).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: