Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It certainly depends on the context, but it's not unheard of for founders to realize their startup isn't experiencing hypergrowth and to shut down the company and return what's left of the money to investors. Usually investors are happy to get some money back versus none.

Of course on the opposite end of the spectrum you have Adam Neumann, who engineered his way to being a billionaire with VC money for a company he seemed pretty happy to jettison once it was convenient to do so.




> a company he seemed pretty happy to jettison once it was convenient to do so.

He was forced out. This is not what the word "jettison" means


He was bought out.


Yea, that's the mechanism by which you're forced out when you hold equity. I'm not saying that he didn't make out like a bandit, but mood affiliation isn't an excuse for making false claims, and claiming that he "jettisoned" the company is flatly false.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: