*he's arguing the property after the fact is worth $2M.* No, he's not. What he p... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

harryh on Jan 7, 2020 | parent | context | favorite | on: California Sues Vinod Khosla over Martins Beach Pu...

he's arguing the property after the fact is worth $2M.

No, he's not. What he paid 10 years ago is not a relevant data point in the calculation. What matters is the current market value.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact