Not a Cloud Kitchens employee, but I interviewed with them. They have bright talent, but the offers aren't all that good, especially for the level of experience they were looking for: they want the cream of the crop of this industry, and they do not want to pay top numbers.
The valuation has the "implicit" success baked into the price already-- and I don't think you could say Uber is a guaranteed success story yet. With CK, you take the risk of being an early employee with very little, if any, upside. This came up in other threads recently, but it's likely better odds to stick with Big N companies.
One angle people might be missing is how much CK is a real estate play. There's real technical problems to tackle, but it requires spinning up these dark kitchens in dense, pricy real estate markets. Conceptually, it's the WeWork of restaurant kitchens, though I'm hesitant to draw that comparison due to the many other connotations of WeWork that I wouldn't associate with CK.
Typical Travis, cheap as hell. He publicly said that people would join Uber for purely monetary gains, so he wouldn't want to pay them much. Back in 2016, he instructed his managers to A/B test packages to see how low a package candidates can accept. Indeed, "forced" is more accurate than "instructed". I guess nothing is wrong with Travis' MO. It's a free market anyway. It's just that I wouldn't bet my future career on him.
I suspect that they've raised $700M because Travis Kalanick is involved. Uber made a lot of people rich, and some of those people would certainly be interested in investing w/ Travis again.
I mean it does seem like a good opportunity. Renting a kitchen or even cooking out of your own kitchen seems like a way to bootstrap to success. I remember hearing/reading an NPR "how I made it" about Stacy's Pita chips and she basically followed this path. Here Travis seems have learned from WeWork to own the real estate and rent out the kitchen as well. It seems like a win-win.
Looks like an excellent opportunity. Real estate is not getting cheaper. I believe they are based in LA, so when I'm ready to move out there guaranteed I'll be applying there. :)
It's interesting that he has apparently faced no consequences within the Silicon Valley community for creating a toxic corporate culture rife with sexual harassment and threatening behavior. (Just one example of many: https://time.com/5023287/uber-threatened-journalist-sarah-la...)
For those of you who don't get that reference because you actually work in Silicon Valley and can't stand to watch the HBO comedy of the same name because it's too much like daily
life:
By physically locating themselves in the upper atmosphere cloud kitchens are saving tons of money on refrigeration costs. Combined with advancements to automated drone deliveries which are JUST around the corner the enterprise could be profitable as soon as Q3 2021.
It’s not clear whether HN has ever approached the same level of signal as subreddits. If you visit reddit front page then surely you’re looking for comedy and chatter, but if you consider the tech subreddits I don’t think Reddit was ever outperformed, such as for the Rust subreddit. In a way HN is all front page, even if its front page is higher signal than Reddit.
You're right, but if Hacker News questioned its deeply held cultural belief in its own intellectual and technical superiority over Reddit, it would have an existential crisis.
Does it? Because lots of shitty cliche jokes regularly get upvoted and built upon even further, whereas others that are actually good get flag-killed within a short timespan. I’ve been looking for an explanation for this wild discrepancy but I’ve come to believe it’s just luck, and depends on people’s collective moods that day.
Would make for an interesting deep-dive to be sure.
I didn't read it. But for some of us, silly inane comments that don't add to the conversation can detract from it.
If that's what you are looking for, may I suggest reddit? On there, an article is posted and you'll have 10,000s of silly one liners with no information or further understanding. Most never having even read the FA. I personally love the fact that /. doesn't allow this. It means those of us who want to discuss topics can actually do so without drowning in a sea of silliness.
most comments argue a position, which doesn't necessarily build bridges either. good satire, even if taking a position, should be thought-provoking rather than simply insulting.
Satire definition:
"the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues."
From Wikipedia:
"satire is a genre of literature and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government, or society itself into improvement."
Not only is satire bad for communication, it's bad for learning, since it must presuppose the person creating the satire is not in the wrong. Generally people who are open to learning start from the perspective they too might be wrong. Of course, you are welcome to show me examples of when satire changed your mind... that would make me reconsider a different perspective.
but those are flat and lifeless definitions of satire. i'm delighted by good satire that points out my own as-yet-undiscovered follies in a wry or clever way. a lot of creative writing and philosophical works do this.
idea exchanged is neutered if all writing must be carefully crafted to not offend even a little bit. plenty of comments here offend others, even without that intent, but the best ones will (1) not target individuals and (2) make a reasonable argument. to me, satire is just adding a little cleverness to these latter kinds of comments.
in any case, i'm not imploring you to agree with me, just adding my voice to the chorus.
Great. Personally, I've changed my mind on some very serious topics: death penalty, addiction, government regulations, capitalism, etc.
In each case, it took someone patiently going over points to help me see better. It takes time for me to fully incorporate new world views. It was a process that required the patience of another human who helped me work through thoughts without judgement or ridicule.
In my case, satire did not help. In fact, it has generally made me double down on my perspective, since it has an inherently ridiculing tone (you might not agree, but that is so by the very definition of the word) - Most people I know double down when confronted with ridicule. In fact most people generally double down on their opinion no matter how thin the evidence in favor of it.
So I'm asking, what deeply held beliefs did you completely change your mind on when confronted with satire? How did it go?
Hearing people's actual experience that is outside of my common conceptions is always super interesting. I'm always open to changing my mind.
