Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Gawker Considered Stupid – Criminally Stupid (marknelson.us)
3 points by nice1 on Feb 7, 2011 | hide | past | favorite | 4 comments



Now if we can just find a cure for websites that require passwords to be inherently insecure (e.g. "8 character limit", "can't use most special symbols", or almost any kind of "security questions").


"That’s why we need to make the storage of encrypted passwords illegal."

Mint.com seems to require storage of plaintext passwords in order to access the financial accounts of its users. How could they get around this?


Explain further?


Mint.com consolidates ones financial accounts and information from several websites. These websites, of course, belong to banks and other financial institutions. Naturally, Mint.com needs the login credentials for those sites. Therefore, a hashed & salted password is useless; Mint needs to store the username & password in plaintext.

Here's some more information: http://fourthcheckraise.blogspot.com/2011/01/might-cost-you-...




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: