Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

uh - I had to re-read this multi-times. Are you opining we should give up the right of privacy to provide a government who has known to abuse mass surveillance and trust them?



I took it to mean that the police might have to settle for actually serving a warrant to the person they're investigating or someone close to them, rather than some third party under a gag order.


They're saying observing you in secret without a served warrant is wrong. (Not saying I agree either way.)


Gotcha I was a bit slow yesterday this makes more sense




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: