Yes, the protocol, yes, the implementation approach, and yes, the underlying crypto. That sounds like a snarky response, but you really did kind of cover it.
I'd say it is. While I'm handwaving based on what I've read - wg should be better for voice and video chat, due to being low-overhead udp - which should translate to lower latency.
Not relevant for most home internet connections
> much simpler to set up than OpenVPN
+1
> and it's much, much more secure than OpenVPN.
That’s uselessly vague. Do you mean the protocol, the implementation approach, the underlying crypto, or what?