OK, I can accept that. But would it not remove instead of "could remove" the SQL layer?
The author(s) just doesn't seem to have a sense of understanding about the subject matter. It appears they are just throwing buzz words and jargon into sentences in the hope that some kind of substance ensues.
I'm sure the author(s) have good intentions and it all makes sense to them, but it is very misleading information at the end of the day. And to quote their About page "Do you love high quality, trusted, and authoritative news" ..
The author(s) just doesn't seem to have a sense of understanding about the subject matter. It appears they are just throwing buzz words and jargon into sentences in the hope that some kind of substance ensues.
I'm sure the author(s) have good intentions and it all makes sense to them, but it is very misleading information at the end of the day. And to quote their About page "Do you love high quality, trusted, and authoritative news" ..