Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>Otherwise your adblock extension could be excluded via robots.txt

I think that's what most people though was wrong in your comment.

Care to elaborate on how an adblock extension could be excluded via robots.txt in that fictive scenario?




If extensions checked to see if they had permission to alter/interfere/access webpages by looking it up in robots.txt, which is what is being suggested by people who say "Bing toolbar violated robots.txt", then that same mechanism could be used to specify:

    User-Agent:adblock
    Disallow: /
Or even, if the "User-Agent: (star)" is supposed to tell Bing Toolbar not to play about with the page, then why doesn't that also apply to all your other extensions/addon/BHO's/plugins whatever you want to call them?


It should, if they're sending data back to the mothership. Alexa's toolbar among others should respect robots.txt




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: