Again, a non-substantive response and deflection. I don't care what credentials pop up when I google your name. You still have provided no actual critiques of anything Michael Lewis has claimed or stated, and instead you continue to make the same "appeal to authority" fallacy (while simultaneously failing to prove why you have any more authority than Lewis).
If you would like explain why Lewis is wrong, I'm all ears. Otherwise take the meaningless criticisms elsewhere.
If you would like explain why Lewis is wrong, I'm all ears. Otherwise take the meaningless criticisms elsewhere.